Save the Baltic Sea
In the past two years we have been working hard in the European Parliament on saving the Baltic Sea.
We drafted a Baltic Sea strategy which was adopted by the parliament with a large majority of votes. You can also find some more information in a Blue Wings column that I wrote on the topic.
During the whole process, we have been cooperating closely with organizations such WWF, Helcom and people from the John Nurminen foundation.
Today we took the most concrete step by tabling three pilot projects to the 2008 budget of the European Commission.
We gathered a list of supporting MEPs from all Baltic Sea states and most political groups.
Now we will try to lobby hard to get these through in the vote. These three pilot projects are obviously not the only ones competing for Commission funding.
Here are the samples of the projects we proposed. The first project is about reducing polution from agriculture. The second one is about measures to prevent degradation of and restoring the deep sea ecosystems. The third one is about reducing polution from leasure boating.
How do you think we should save the baltic sea?
Pilot project 1:
The aim of the pilot project is to decrease diffuse nutrient loading from agriculture, concentrating specifically to the critical sub-catchment areas of the Baltic Sea drainage basin. Furthermore, this initiative introduces a particular recipe of concrete environmental measures: (a) Restoration and establishment of wetlands, (b) Establishment of buffer zones between cultivated fields and aquatic ecosystems, (c) Analyses of the soil properties and nutrient balance calculations and (d) A set of other environmental measures tailored in farm-specific fashion. Based on the individual circumstances, farm-specific counselling could point out the most effective environmental measures that should be implemented in each farm. The need for these measures is widely recognized, yet almost fully unimplemented across member states. Since 2004 the Baltic Sea has had a special importance for the European Union as eight of the nine riparian countries are EU-member states.
Pilot project 2:
Marine transportation is in rapid growth in the Baltic Sea. Environmental risks and contamination of the Baltic Sea caused by, for example, oils and other hazardous substances, lavatory waters, solid waste and air polluting substances, should be minimized.
In the leisure boat sector the development of sanitary waste processing facilities has been slow in the Baltic Sea yacht marinas. Building a system of septic tanks that can be emptied at the harbours is important as it has high local significance. Toxic paints are used in the bottom of boats to prevent marine animal attachment to boat bottoms. These paints contain several hazardous substances and thus alternative methods have been developed to prevent animal attachment.
Pilot project 3:
Comprehensive search for former hazardous waste land fills in the sea area of all Baltic countries, which have the potential of polluting the Baltic Sea with thousands of tons of hazardous substances, should be carried out. In addition, as the known hazardous waste land fills contain mixed hazardous waste and have typically no ownership, economically feasible environmentally sound management practices should be further developed.
The deep water layers of the small and large semi-enclosed basins suffer from lack of oxygen. Thus, large amounts of phosphorus are released from sediment into the water column, which enhances eutrophication. The oxygen-rich surface water can be pumped from the surface water to deep water layers. Testing of the method and equipment should be made in a small semi-enclosed basin in order to ensure the positive effects of oxygenation in water and surface sediment before large scale implementation.
10 kommenttia
Heidi V - en ole nähnyt proggista. Se kuvattiin alkukeväästä Strassissa. Oli loistava kuvaustiimi ja Krisse on mahtava tyyppi. Naurettiin kippurassa kolme päivää. Ohjelma jakaa varmaan mielipiteet aika tasan kahtia. Mielenkiintoista nähdä mitä blogikommentaattorit ovat mieltä...
Ainakin päivän Hesarin telkkarisivuilla oli aika rankkaa kommenttia Krissen ohjelmasta. Siis ei erityisen positiivista kommenttia.
I have a hunch that much of the scientific knowledge (i.e. on chemicals and their substitutes, ecology of marine plants and animals etc.) already exists (not meaning that this data could not be improved with further studies, of course). In my opinion, what is called for is a large-scale conservation plan for the whole of Baltic Sea, which takes into account both the biological and economical factors. We have this type of expertise e.g. in one of our Centres of Excellence in Finland (see http://www.helsinki.fi/science/metapop/english/Research/Project_reserveselection.htm). Into this kind of "total" model such information as data from restoration pilots, data of ecological observations about species and data from necessary human use can be included.
The major issue in conserving/restoring the Baltic Sea is to overcome the political/economical obstacles that prevent the efficient use of biological knowledge in conservation/restoration. With large-scale conservation planning, resulting in an actual realistic plan it is easier to assure politicians about the needs and means of conservation.
I'm very glad to see that Alex is working for the future of the Baltic sea. It is very important for all EU states (and Russia) with a Baltic coast-line to work together to improve the state of the sea.
With regards to the projects Alex listed, I would recon that nr. 1 is the one that has the biggest impact on the general state of the sea. Naturally, i don't want to diminish the importance of the other projects.
I hope EU can field some serious resources and legislation aimed at tackling the issue.
Ihan mahtava Krisse Road Show. Huippua että uskalsit ottaa tällaisen vieraan. :)
Hei Alex,
haluaisin kuulla sinun mielipiteesi jenkkien suunnittelemasta "nettiviisumista". EU-parlamentti aikoo ilmeisesti kommentoida asiaa jotenkin? Itse en pidä ajatuksesta yhtään. Kiltisti olen aiemmin suostunut viisumia hankkiessani vastaamaan "Are you a prostitute/terrorist/drug dealer?" -tyyppisiin kysymyksiin, mutta nyt tuntuu että mennään liian pitkälle. Sormenjälkeni niillä jo on, mitä muuta ne vielä haluaa?? Sitä paitsi on hankala käsittää, millä tavalla tämä nettikaavake edes torjuisi terrorismia. Eiköhän sitä tyhmempikin osaa vastata kysymyksiin noihin kysymyksiin NO. Ajatuksiasi aiheesta?
Hei Pirkko - juu huomasin Hesarin arvion. Ei tainnut kriitikko oikein tykätä...=). Toisaalta Iltalehdessä ja Husiksessa oli ihan positiiviset arviot.
Katsoin itsekin ohjelman täällä Hämeenlinnassa. Tuli kyllä naurettua, mutta nimenomaan Krissen jutuille. Hän oli briljantti! Se show on Krissen. Vieras/isäntä on vain sivujuoni.
Osoitit loistavan persoonallisuutesi Krisse road showssa, juuri tuollaista julkista esiintymistä kansa tarvitsee poliitikoilta jäykkien televisiohaastatteluiden lisäksi. Ei ryppyotsaisuutta vaan myös huumoria, hienoa Alex!
Hyvä että teemme työtä samaan suuntaan sekä EU:n asolla että kansallisestikin, jotta Itämeri pelastuisi. Vaikka asian kanssa puuhattuani vuodesta 1991 kaikki tuntuu etenevän aivan liian hitaasti.
Olemme juuri hallituksen budjettineuvotteluissa päättäneet käyttää miljoona euroa Aurajoen ja Eurajoen maatalouden päästöjen vähentämiseen tähtääviin täsmätoimiin. Eli Saaristomeri saa näin hieman helpotusta.Tämä on taas pieni askel oikeaan suuntaan...



Hei, kertoisitko Krissen vierailusta Parlamentissa? Aion katsoa ohjelman siitä tänään :) Vähän toisenlaista näkökulmaa EU-asioihin...?